jd โ’ถโ˜…๐Ÿ˜ผ๐Ÿš€๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ is a user on soc.ialis.me. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.
jd โ’ถโ˜…๐Ÿ˜ผ๐Ÿš€๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ @jd

Tim Wu writes: '...The right question: What comes after ? Yes, we have come to depend on social networks, but instead of accepting an inherently flawed Facebook monopoly, what we most need now is a new generation of social media platforms that are fundamentally different in their incentives and dedication to protecting user data. Barring a total overhaul of leadership and business model, Facebook will never be that platform....'

nytimes.com/2018/04/03/opinion
โ€“ archived at: archive.fo/1uyFf

ยท 7 ยท 9

^^^ continue quoting Tim Wu

'...The ideal competitor and successor to Facebook would be a platform that actually puts such goals first. To do so, however, it cannot be just another data-hoarder, like Google Plus. If we have learned anything over the last decade, it is that advertising and data-collection models are incompatible with a trustworthy social media network. The conflicts are too formidable, the pressure to amass data and promise everything to advertisers is too strong for even the well-intentioned to resist.
So what stands in the way of building a genuine alternative? It isnโ€™t the technology. A good Facebook competitor needs merely to build a platform that links you with friends and allows posting of thoughts, pictures and comments. No, the real challenge is gaining a critical mass of users...'

^^^ another quote of Tim Wu

'...Another โ€œalt-Facebookโ€ could be a nonprofit that uses that status to signal its dedication to better practices, much as nonprofit hospitals and universities do. Wikipedia is a nonprofit, and it manages nearly as much traffic as Facebook, on a much smaller budget. An โ€œalt-Facebookโ€ could be started by Wikimedia, or by former Facebook employees, many of whom have congregated at the Center for Humane Technology, a nonprofit for those looking to change Silicon Valleyโ€™s culture. It could even be funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which was created in reaction to the failures of commercial television and whose mission includes ensuring access to โ€œtelecommunications services that are commercial free and free of charge.โ€...'

@jd

> Wikipedia

has a fuckload of problems, and I don't know if Wikimedia suffers from them but I'm wary of placing Wikimedia in charge of anything at that level of importance

> former Facebook employees, many of whom have congregated at the Center for Humane Technology, a nonprofit for those looking to change Silicon Valleyโ€™s culture. It could even be funded by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting

these two options sound WAY better, esp the last one

maybe we get another Mister Rogers

Tim Wu article ^^^

Facebook: โ€˜Malicious actorsโ€™ used its tools to discover identities and collect data on a massive global scale
washingtonpost.com/news/the-sw
' said Wednesday that โ€œmalicious actorsโ€ took advantage of search tools on its platform, making it possible for them to discover the identities and collect information on most of its 2 billion users worldwide.

.... Among the announcements Wednesday was that Cambridge Analytica, a political consultancy hired by President Trump and other Republicans, had improperly gathered detailed Facebook information on 87 million people, of whom 71 million were Americans....'

Can We Be Saved From Facebook?
โ€“ By Matt Taibbi
rollingstone.com/politics/feat
'...It was all an insane accident. never wanted to be editor-in-chief of the universe, and the relatively vibrant free press that toppled the likes of McCarthy and Nixon never imagined it could be swallowed by a pet-meme distributor.

But it happened. As a result, we're now facing a problem potentially worse than either a Trump election or a Russian cyber-incursion: a world in which the informational landscape for billions of people is controlled more or less entirely by a pair of advanced private spying operations, Google and Facebook โ€“ and Facebook especially.

.... The creators of the Internet sold their invention as inherently democratizing. Instead, information is now so concentrated that a 1984 scenario is just a few clicks away...'

@jd No the creators of the internet sold it as a DARPA military communications project. But they wanted it to be open and noncommercial, that is true.