@jd
Wow. Russia, the Nordic countries and Greenland ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

@jd

this made me lough.

"But you can't put north to the bottom!"

"Why not?"

"Because it's freaking me out!"

youtube.com/watch?v=vVX-PrBRtT

@luka @jd Well, I suppose it doesn't really matter, technically - especially if you've seen the Earth from space - but at this point in human evolution, yeah, a lot of humans would be really weirded out.

@_do_mi_ni_que @luka @jd Wow, that's fascinating. By "true size" do they mean population?

@jd What happened to Greenland?! Is it global warming?๐Ÿ™ƒ

@jd It's really cool but i'd say that's the real size but not the real shape... mercator deforms the shape more in the places nearer to the poles, so the real shapes are reduced in a different way... i guess...

@ekaitz_zarraga
It *says* "True Size", not true shape, doesn't it?
@jd

@erAck @jd It does, but it's cool to know the shape would be other, isn't it?

@ekaitz_zarraga @jd Basically, pretty much every attempt at map "projection" is an attempt to make sense out of the topography of a sphere on a sheet of paper. Gotta make it fit somehow.

The first time I saw Earth on TV via an Apollo mission telecast, it took me forever to make sense of it - not just because of the swirling cloud cover, but because it wasn't in "north is up" position like the globe in school.

@flugennock
@ekaitz_zarraga @jd
There is a very interesting article on Wikipedia about this issue: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Map_pr
When I read it I was amazed at the complexity of it, in the sense of trying to keep all the properties of the countries (relative areas, shapes, positions...)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
soc.ialis.me mastodon

A generalistic Mastodon instance hosted in France, open to all and available since the 9 April 2017. Learn about the instance information and guidelines.